Baxter was litigated as a case (like nearly 20 such cases in other states) seeking a state constitutional right to MAID. In fact the Montana District Court held that a competent, terminally ill patient has a right to die with dignity under Article II, Sections 4 and 10 of the Montana Constitution. But the Supreme Court declined to rule on that because it determined that MAID was not even prohibited by Montana law. Courts almost always decline to reach constitutional questions if answering them is unnecessary.
If the legislature clarifies that MAID really is prohibited under Montana statutory law, then the previously bypassed constitutional question becomes ripe.
Litigants will bring another Baxter case. The Montana Constitution has not been amended since 2009. So, the same provisions that led the District Court to find a constitutional right in December 2008 should lead both the next district court and the Supreme Court to find the same in 2025 and 2026.

No comments:
Post a Comment