The jury issued a defense verdict. Carl and Teresa appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in its jury instructions, because there was no written informed consent for the injection and manipulation procedure. The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the judgment, holding that Nebraska law does not require informed consent to be written.
This decision nicely illustrates that what matters is the content of the clinician-patient communication rather than the patient's signature on a form.
![]() |
| Dr. Jason Mickels |

No comments:
Post a Comment