They argue that getting access to and approval from a clinician is a barrier. Consequently, these advocates are focusing on improving access to non-medical means of hastening death.
However, "assisting" people to hasten their deaths through non-medical means entails more legal risk. It is not protected with a statutory safe harbor like MAID. Consequently, these groups must be careful to stick to pure speech. And not even that is always a safe approach.

No comments:
Post a Comment