This article quotes me on some of the implications of Warren v. Dinter on curbside consults and independent medical examiners.
Last month, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a treatment relationship is not a prerequisite for imposing medical malpractice liability.
I explore lessons from the case in more detail in a forthcoming article in The ASCO Post: "Curbside Consults: New Liability Risks to Avoid When You Are Not the Patient’s Physician."

No comments:
Post a Comment