There are good reasons for TADA being crafted just the way that it is. Nevertheless, it does present a risk that some Texas ethics committees will not deal with the conflict as framed (e.g. as a sword fight, as a communication breakdown). Rather they may succumb to the temptation to just pull out the trump card (e.g. a pistol, a 166.046 process) that the state legislature has given them.
On this blog, Professor Thaddeus Pope tracks judicial, legislative, policy, and academic developments concerning medical futility and the limits on individual autonomy at the end of life.
Monday, July 5, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


1 comments:
I believe the process is flawed, in that the hospital's internal ethics committee is given the power to make decisions (as I understand it).
If there is to be a formal resolution process, then I feel that any committee should not have an economic interest in the outcome (i.e., not be based in the hospital that is losing money on the care). A statewide ethics committee would be a much better solution.
Joe
Post a Comment